I’ve Got A Man Crush on Daniel Kahneman

It should come as no surprise to those who follow my Twitter Feed and this blog that I’ve got a huge man crush on Daniel Kahneman, the Nobel Prize in Economics winning psychologist. I finished his latest book this week, Thinking Fast and Slow, and it is by far the best book I read in 2011.

The book covers Kahneman’s lengthy career in academia that essentially created behavioral economics. To get a feel for him and his book check out this TED talk he gave a couple years ago.

 

Charter Cities: The Future or Future Failure?

I’ve been fascinated by the concept of “charter cities” since I first saw Paul Romer’s talk on Ted.com (watch it here) describing the idea. The basic premise is that governance is transferable and that rather than waiting for nations to get their act together, they can set up cities that essentially outsource government. These cities can then gradually influence the rest of the country (think Hong Kong to China).

While the idea sometimes gets discussed in academic circles, it looks like it might actually be implemented in Honduras over the coming years. The government in Honduras voted to allow for the creation of autonomous zones, not held to local or federal laws, and Future Cities Development, Inc., has signed a non-binding memorandum of understanding to build a city in one such zone starting next year.

Interestingly enough, Future Cities is run by Patri Friedman, the grandson of libertarian economist Milton Friedman, and the company is largely built upon the ideas his grandfather discussed as an economist.

I think it will be very interesting to follow this development. Building cities from scratch is not new, but the idea of autonomous zones where companies compete for citizens is definitely new. Companies competing for citizens to drive up land values is certainly interesting, and academically it is what nations do, but how this will work outside the classroom remains to be seen.

Thanks to Greg Lindsay’s blog for bringing this to my attention.

 

The TED of Meetings

I have to admit, I love meetings. I love sharing ideas, solving problems, and wrestling towards a goal with others. But most meetings fall far short of the meetings I love because they are unfocused, redundant, affirming the status quo, or just plain boring.

Over on the Modern Meeting Standard blog, they wrote a post, Why TED Talks Work, where they seek to create the TED talk of meetings. TED talks are 18 minutes, not 15 not 20. Why not make a meeting 23 minutes or 13 or 7? It would grab everyone’s attention and make the meeting really count.

I think the real challenge though, is holding a meeting that’s engaging. Why not forego the traditional powerpoint and make something more visually engaging? Why not create in pictures rather than use words? How can you make the content of the meeting interesting?

But I think the best way to make the content interesting is to have content that is relevant to everyone in the room. Make sure that the what is being discussed is actually relevant to the people in the meeting. Give them things to say prior to the meeting and give them tasks to accomplish after the meeting. If you don’t leave a meeting with a to-do list, you’ve made an error.

Check out The Modern Meeting Standard for more great thoughts on running engaging meetings.