2010-toyota-prius-detroit-auto-show-at-the-show_thumb-300x204

Conspicuous Philanthropy

There is a theory in economics called Conspicuous Consumption. It’s essentially the “Keeping Up With The Jones’” theory. People buy things so that they can signal some sort of status or ideology. When you see your neighbor buy that nice car, you want one as well so you don’t appear less than your neighbor. I think we can all admit that we’ve at least seen this behavior (not in ourselves of course but in our neighbors).

This morning I came across an interesting Freakonomics podcast about Conspicuous Conservation. It profiled two budding economists, Steve and Alison Sexton (twins, and worse, the children of economists). They have an interesting draft of a paper entitled, “Conspicuous Conservation: The Prius Effect and WTP [Willingess to Pay] for environmental bona fides.”

They essentially are saying that because the Prius is known as a hybrid and hybrid only, as opposed to say the hybrid version of another car (the Honda Civic Hybrid for example), it is more easily identified as hybrid and provides a better signal to the world that the driver cares about the environment. This signal however, only matters in areas where others care about the environment, for example in San Francisco rather than Texas.

What they found is that in areas with higher rates of environmentalism not only do you see the sale of all hybrid vehicles increase, sales of Prius’ are a markedly higher proportion of the market. People want others to see them as environmentally friendly.

Now what does this have to do with philanthropy?

What if, philanthropy harnessed this conspicuousness in a new way. For decades people’s names have been added to buildings, benches, etc. But what if we found new ways to allow people to engage in conspicuous philanthropy?

I think we’re already beginning to see this movement take place and it has a lot to do with revenue streams.

People don’t but Toms because they are particularly good shoes, they buy Toms because they want to signal to the world that they care about poor people, that they have given a pair of shoes to someone in need.

What are ways that your organization can help donors engage in conspicuous philanthropy? How can you tap into consumerism to increase support for your organization?

foodbank

Activities vs Outcomes

Activities are the things we do. Outcomes are the things we produce. Outcomes are more necessary than activities and today’s donors don’t want to just fund activities, they want to purchase outcomes.

An activity is handing out food at a food pantry. An outcome is helping people move from food dependence to food independence.

An activity is running an after-school basketball league. An outcome is increasing the odds a student ends up in college.

Activities make up the day to day life of social entrepreneurs and nonprofit leaders. Outcomes are why they started the organization to begin with. Read More…

Tee-shirt

Sevenly: Bringing Philanthropy to Ecommerce

Yesterday Mashable highlighted the new online t-shirt store, Sevenly. It’s a simple model, sell a t-shirt designed to raise awareness about a particular non-profit, and then give $7 of every purchase to that non-profit. Their first partnership was with International Justice Mission, and this week’s shirts support World Relief.

It’s probably no surprise to many of you but I love this kind of stuff. I love integrating social causes into business and seeing the market support social causes. Nonprofits need to take this kind of revenue stream seriously and think of creative ways to tap into the market.

This is just another example of how philanthropy is beginning to change. Everyone wants to be a donor. It is not just the wealthy who are giving. The more we can find ways to tap into a broad market the stronger your revenue streams will be.

Of course, these kinds of projects are often limited in scope. IJM for example, only received $6,125 from the sale of Sevenly t-shirts. But I do believe potential is there and that moving forward these kinds of social entrepreneur projects will begin to play a larger role in the revenue streams of nonprofits.

To read the articles from Mashable click here and here.

Fundraising Tree

Why Limiting Charitable Deductions Might Actually Help Charities

The Philantopic blog had a great post today about the Obama administration proposal on limiting itemized deductions on charitable giving. It quoted a survey by the Association of Fundraising Proposals that found that development officers expect to see at least a slight drop in giving if the proposal goes into effect.

As a University of Chicago trained economist, this make sense. As it becomes more expensive to give, people will do less of it.

But is it a wholly awful scenario? Read More…