How to Think Like a Philanthropic Investor

Imagine for a minute a world in which you did not reap the benefits of your investment. You still invested in the market but the profits and losses would not be allocated to you, they’d be given to someone else. How would you make your investment decisions? You would not care whether your investment turned a profit or not so you would not use that criteria. Your investing would be haphazard at best.

Unfortunately this is the reality in the nonprofit sector. Our “investors” do not reap the benefits of our work. They give on behalf of someone else, someone they most likely will never meet. I’ve written often about this fundamental distortion and it continues to plague my thinking. So how can we try and correct this uniqueness in the nonprofit sector?

1) Think in terms of outcomes. It is very easy to become a donor who gives to what is cool, trendy, or makes you feel good. It’s easy because that is the easiest thing to base our decisions on. Try and move beyond that. Peruse some annual reports, talk to a staff member, try and meet someone who benefits from the organizations work.

2) Think critically. When making investing decisions we think critically about the business model, leadership, and product that a company has to offer. Do the same when it comes to your philanthropic giving. Does the model they are using make intuitive sense? Do they have research to back up what they are doing? Does it seem like they are offering something that is making a difference in the world?

3) Don’t stress. Celebrate your philanthropic efforts and don’t let them become overly burdensome. If you even move a little into the investor mentality you are leaps & bounds beyond most donors. There are very few organizations where your money will actually do damage, thinking like an investor is all about maximizing the return of your philanthropic gift which is an unattainable goal.

An Introduction to Measurement & Evaluation

If you’re a leader you know the feeling. You’ve been executing a strategy, implementing a program, or just performing business as usual and yet you have no idea how effective you are. You have an intuition you’re moving in the right direction but you really have no idea. For nonprofit leaders the feeling can be intensified since you don’t have a profit statement grounding you in reality.

Next week I’ll be doing a FREE 30 minutes webinar introduction to measurement & evaluation. M&E is all about looking, understanding, and maximizing impact. The impact of your programming. The impact of your strategy. The impact of your decisions.

The webinar will be a great introduction to some of the basic concepts in M&E and you will leave with some tools to help bring back to your team. We will be looking at:

  • Creating a Theory of Change
  • The role of M&E in strategic decision making
  • What data you should be focusing on

Space is extremely limited so if you are interested click here to register. The webinar will run from 12-12:30 CST on Thursday, March 8th.

Steven Honors Steve

Stephen Colbert memorialized America’s other Steve this week on his show. What I love about this short clip, and what I think Colbert does better than anyone else, is use humor to pack and emotional punch. I was laughing right along with him and then in 15 seconds and fewer words he was able to draw a tear and warm my heart. Check it out below.

 

Honest Political Discussion: A Real Endangered Species

Governor Mitch Daniels was on The Daily Show last night. Its no secret that I’m a big fan of Jon Stewart’s and believe him to be one of the best interviewers, especially regarding politics, on TV. The interview with Mitch ran long, about 25 minutes, so they couldn’t show it all on the show but its definitely worth watching. Its the rare honest and polite political discussion that is missing from much of today’s debate.

Check out the full interview below.

 

 

 

Overhead Is Not The Enemy

I was out last night with some people working to bring a social entrepreneurship conference to Chicago and during the discussion one of the offhandedly made a comment deriding overhead in non-profits. Unfortunately overhead has come to mean waste when really that should not be the case.

Overhead is not the enemy, inefficiency is.

All organizations, including for-profit companies have overhead but they are forced to use that overhead efficiently, maximizing the return on that investment. For example, what if Apple had to cap salaries at $100,000? Would they be able to retain the talent necessary to succeed? What if every dollar pumped into R&D had to show immediate ROI?

Overhead can actually increase the effectiveness of the programming and if an organization increased overhead a little, they might actually be able to do more with the fewer resources going into the field. Yet, non-profits have been forced to compete on overhead numbers and it is hurting the end result, impact.